There are several really good videos by people more knowledgeable on using the SkyGuider Pro than I am and have included links to a few of them:
Peter Zelinka:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jssf2ffHYbc
AstroBackyard:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFnTm30bzBw&t=159s
Universal Observations:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM377PW7fV8
However, I wanted focus in on the use of a 200mm lens. What makes using the 200mm difficult it is right on the fence of the weight limit iOptron recommends for the mount without using the counterweight. iOptron recommends 1.5 kg or 3.3 lbs for the weight limit and that is what the camera and lens together weigh. If the ball head is added the weight becomes 1.8 kg or 4.0 lbs.
After contacting Peter Zelinka with regard to this who suggested the counterweight may not be needed, I imaged the Seagull Nebula taking one minute exposures without the counterweight.
Location: Home Monroe, CT
Date: 4-1-19
Camera: Canon T3i/600D modified
Lens: Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Focal Length: 200mm
f/3.5
Mount: iOptron SkyGuider Pro on a Manfrotto Tripod
Filter: Astronomik UHF Clip-in
Autoguiding: none
Exposure: 25 x 60s
ISO: 1600
Processing: DSS, PixInsight, Photoshop, Lightroom
The image came out fine, however, some stars appear oblong close up.
I also imaged the Sadr Region taking one minute exposures using the counterweight using the counterweight this time.
Location: Home Monroe, CT
Date: 6-11-19, 6-14-19, 6-22-19
Camera: Canon T3i/600D modified
Lens: Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Focal Length: 200mm
Ha f/2.8, RGB f/3.2
Mount: iOptron SkyGuider Pro on a Manfrotto Tripod
Filter: Astronomik Ha 12nm Clip-in
Autoguiding: none
Exposure: Ha 130 x 60s, RGB 171 x 30s
ISO: 1600
Processing: DSS, PixInsight, Photoshop, Lightroom
Results
The stars are more rounded in this image for the most part but the image without the counterweight is acceptable.
The results suggest the decent images can be taken using the 200mm lens without the counterweight but the counterweight does produce slightly better results. The counterweight also has the advantage of doing a polar alignment with the camera already attached and checking on it periodically during imaging.
For my own purposes, I will use the counterweight when I am home or traveling by car. If I am traveling where space and weight are a factor, I may leave the counterweight behind.
The results suggest the decent images can be taken using the 200mm lens without the counterweight but the counterweight does produce slightly better results. The counterweight also has the advantage of doing a polar alignment with the camera already attached and checking on it periodically during imaging.
For my own purposes, I will use the counterweight when I am home or traveling by car. If I am traveling where space and weight are a factor, I may leave the counterweight behind.
Very nice images. Amazing what a simple setup can do! Thank you for presenting.
ReplyDeleteThanks Bill. I really enjoy having this, it opens up a lot of possibilities with imaging.
ReplyDelete